ORCID Identifier(s)

ORCID 0009-0001-9956-6025

Graduation Semester and Year

Spring 2026

Language

English

Document Type

Thesis

Degree Name

Master of Science in Civil Engineering

Department

Civil Engineering

First Advisor

Dr. MD Sahadat Hossain

Second Advisor

Dr. Xinbao Yu

Third Advisor

Dr. Warda Ashraf

Abstract

Expansive soils inflict an estimated nine to fifteen billion dollars in annual damage to infrastructure across the United States, surpassing the combined losses from earthquakes, floods, hurricanes, and tornadoes (Nelson and Miller, 1997; Jones and Jefferson, 2012). In Texas, eighteen of twenty-five TxDOT districts contend with pavement failure rooted in moisture-driven volume change of subgrade clay, consuming roughly twenty-five percent of the agency's annual budget for maintenance and repair (Sebesta, 2002; Wanyan et al., 2010). Conventional remediation approaches, including soil replacement, chemical stabilization with lime or cement, and prewetting, are either prohibitively expensive, unsuitable for high-sulfate soils, or confined to surficial treatment that fails to address the underlying moisture mechanism (Snethen, 1979; Mitchell and Dermatas, 1992).

This thesis presents a multi-site field evaluation of Modified Moisture Barrier (MMB) systems for subgrade stabilization of flexible pavements on expansive soils in North Texas. The MMB, comprising a geocomposite drainage layer underlain by an impermeable LLDPE geomembrane at the base–subgrade interface, intercepts downward-percolating rainwater and channels it laterally to the pavement edge while completely isolating the subgrade from vertical infiltration. Two TxDOT installations were monitored: the Dallas site (FM 1836, Kaufman) with Lean Clay (CL) subgrade over thirty months, and the Fort Worth site (FM 1884, Weatherford) with Clayey Sand (SC) subgrade over twenty months. Both sites were instrumented with moisture and suction sensors at multiple depths, horizontal inclinometers, and periodic electrical resistivity imaging (ERI) surveys.

At Dallas, the barrier section exhibited a maximum moisture deviation of only 0.5% compared to 4.2% in the control, suction remained within a 1.1 kPa range versus 9.1 kPa in the control, vertical deformation was reduced by sixty-two percent, and zero surface cracks appeared through thirty months while the control cracked at twenty-four months. At Fort Worth, all monitored sections maintained stable moisture profiles independent of rainfall, and monthly ERI surveys confirmed consistently higher resistivity beneath the barrier relative to the unprotected control. These multi-site results, spanning two distinct soil classifications and multiple seasonal cycles, demonstrate that MMB is a cost-effective, sustainable, and readily deployable solution, and strongly supports its wider adoption across TxDOT districts.

Keywords

Modified Moisture Barrier (MMB), expansive soils, pavement distress, subgrade stabilization, geocomposite, geomembrane, volumetric moisture content, suction pressure, horizontal inclinometer, electrical resistivity imaging (ERI), flexible pavement, North Texas

Disciplines

Civil Engineering

License

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.