Graduation Semester and Year
2020
Language
English
Document Type
Dissertation
Degree Name
Doctor of Philosophy in Urban Planning and Public Policy
Department
Urban and Public Affairs
First Advisor
Ivonne Audirac
Abstract
Exiting research supports dog parks as a third place based on the ability of dog-supportive public space to bring people together informally outside home and work (Graham and Glover, 2014), yet offers little clarity in terms of strength of interaction. Ray Oldenburg (1989), the originator of the notion of third place, stresses the importance of certain contexts in supporting repeat encounters, which he explains are of crucial importance to effective third places, while lamenting their absence in suburban America. A careful review of his work in this dissertation raises the question, is a dog park within a suburban Dallas context capable of supporting an effective third place? This research consists of two case studies. The first compares social interaction within two dog parks, one in New Urban Addison Circle, a mixed use, compact neighborhood, and the other located nearby within a traditional suburban North Dallas neighborhood considering two dog parks are comparable in terms of watering and facilities. A second case study controls for context by comparing the social interaction within one of these dog parks with a small urban non-dog park within the same New Urban neighborhood and two blocks away. This study’s overall thesis is that to qualify as an effective third place, parks must meet detailed criteria as laid out by Oldenburg (1989). The study’s main research questions address the following additional theses: 1) Social interaction in dog parks can go beyond casual greetings associated with urban parks to be stimulators of meaningful face-to-face social interaction; 2) The neighborhood’s urban densities and mixtures of use may modulate the effectiveness of face-to-face interaction and strength of ties occurring in dog parks. Data derived from six weeks of observation and interviews of users within these parks compare macro- and micro-level contextual variations against the rate, quality, and strength of social interaction taking place in each park. The research supports the dog park as a third place in either the suburban or urban setting, while concluding stronger ties may be associated with the New Urban context.
Keywords
Dog, Park, New, Urban, Planning, Context, Social, Interaction, Suburban, Sense, Community, Tie, Strength, Mixed, Use, Density, Pathway, Walkability, Walking, Sociability, Sociology, Landscape, Architecture
Disciplines
Public Affairs | Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration | Social and Behavioral Sciences
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Recommended Citation
Lee, Lori Dynette, "THE CHARISMATIC DOG AND PUBLIC SPACE: ARE DOG PARKS A THIRD PLACE?" (2020). Public Affairs Dissertations. 206.
https://mavmatrix.uta.edu/publicaffairs_dissertations/206
Comments
Degree granted by The University of Texas at Arlington