ORCID Identifier(s)

0009-0005-7176-4168

Document Type

Report

Abstract

This report uses geographic data to identify development predictors and assemble site-ranking scorecards for deck park development. Deck parks are an increasingly popular, if understudied, urban intervention often used to mitigate the effects of highway development, pedestrianized urban areas, and promote development. This research collected data from 19 parks across the United States using the American Community Survey and observed Geospatial Features to develop predictors that relate to deck park implementation measured in $/ft^2. Predictors were analyzed using Pearson correlation testing to assess if there was a significant correlation between certain variables. If a correlation was found, predictors were moved to subsequent rounds of regression analysis to test null hypotheses. Non-experimental analysis showed that predictors from the American Community Survey and observed Geospatial Feature categories had significant relationships with deck park development (p < 0.05). Of 151 variables originally developed from data collection, 6 were found to significantly predict deck park development and disprove their null hypotheses. Four scorecards that integrated results from correlation and regression analysis were developed to compare and rank potential deck park locations. Three potential deck park locations identified by the city of Dallas were scored to observe how results varied between scorecards.

The scorecard that integrated correlation results was found to be the most insightful and complex scorecard and included only variables that could test null hypotheses and answer research questions. This scorecard can be used with a correlation-based scorecard for further insight and verification across a larger number of variables. Practitioners may benefit from developing their scoring methods according to available data and desired outcomes. Resulting scorecards can be useful for ranking and comparing proposed deck park locations but should not be used in favor of other methods that incorporate stakeholder feedback and community engagement

Disciplines

Cultural Resource Management and Policy Analysis | Urban, Community and Regional Planning

Publication Date

Spring 5-7-2025

Language

English

Comments

Advised by Dr. Deden Rukmana

License

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.