Document Type


Source Publication Title

Technical Report 61


When there are available several point estimators of some parametric function, it would seem desirable to make a comparison among the estimators based on some measure of closeness to the true value. Along these lines, the concept of Pitman-closeness (PC) efficiency is introduced. Essentially, when comparing two estimators, PC efficiency gives the odds in favor of one of the estimators being closer to the true value in a given situation than is the other. The traditional method of comparison, i.e., mean squared (MS) efficiency is also considered. This paper presents graphical results based on simulation techniques which depict PC efficiencies as well as MS efficiencies of the following estimators of the reliability function R(t) of a 2-parameter exponential failure model: (i) the maximum likelihood estimator(R ^_MLE (t)), (ii) the minimum variance unbiased estimator (R ^_MVUE (t)) and (iii) a Bayesian/structural estimator (R ^_SE (t)). Based on the graphs, R ^_SE (t) is, in general, preferred (in the sense of having the best chance of being closest to the true value of R(t)) except (a) when R(t) is very high, in which case (R ^_MLE (t)) is preferred, and (b) when R(t) is moderate and the sample size is small to moderate, in which case R ^_MVUE (t) is preferred.


Mathematics | Physical Sciences and Mathematics

Publication Date




Included in

Mathematics Commons



To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.