ORCID Identifier(s)

0009-0007-4526-1131

Graduation Semester and Year

Spring 2025

Language

English

Document Type

Dissertation

Degree Name

Doctor of Philosophy in Accounting

Department

Accounting

First Advisor

Ramgopal Venkataraman

Second Advisor

Nandu J. Nagarajan

Third Advisor

Mahmut Yasar

Abstract

Economic theory suggests that firms comply with regulations when the expected costs of noncompliance outweigh the expected benefits (Becker 1968). Despite minimal enforcement, weak penalties, and strong incentives for noncompliance, some firms comply with the provisions of the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification (WARN) Act, which mandates advance notice of mass layoffs and plant closings. Using a sample of 7,084 firm-years necessitating WARN Act disclosures from 2000 to 2020, I reassess the cost-benefit calculus by first demonstrating that wage theft violations provide the incentives necessary to compel firms to comply with other minimally enforced laws like WARN. Next, I find that firms with either prior wage theft violations or a high likelihood of future infractions are more likely to issue WARN notices, consistent with firms reassessing their compliance decisions as their violation profile changes in anticipation of future wage theft. Furthermore, the role of legal expertise in this decision-making process is nuanced: while firms with prominent general counsel are, on average, less likely to comply with the WARN Act, this relationship reverses when prior wage violations or high likelihood of future infractions exist, suggesting that legal expertise can act as a mitigation mechanism in the presence of heightened regulatory exposure. These findings present novel evidence on the interactive effect of regulations and how reputational effects can serve as an indirect cost of non-compliance for regulations that prima facie are weakly enforced. My research also highlights the critical role of legal counsel in shaping adherence to minimally enforced labor regulations that have meaningful consequences for workers.

Keywords

Wage Theft, WARN Act Compliance, Regulatory Spillovers, General Counsel Influence, Labor Law Enforcement

Disciplines

Accounting

License

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Included in

Accounting Commons

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.